This investigation evaluates how construction and demolition waste affects the mechanical performance and durability of mortars, suggesting effective environmental strategies.
The construction industry plays a major role in the consumption of natural resources and the generation of waste. Construction and demolition waste (CDW) is produced in substantial volumes globally and is widely available. Its accumulation poses serious challenges related to storage and disposal, highlighting the need for effective strategies to mitigate the associated environmental impacts of the sector. This investigation intends to evaluate the influence of mixed CDW on the physical, mechanical, and durability properties of mortars with CDW partially replacing Portland cement, and allow performance comparisons with mortars produced with fly ash, a commonly used supplementary binder in cement-based materials. Thus, three mortar formulations were developed (reference mortar, mortar with 25% CDW, and mortars with 25% fly ash) and several characterization tests were carried out on the CDW powder and the developed mortars. The work’s principal findings revealed that through mechanical grinding processes, it was possible to obtain a CDW powder suitable for cement replacement and with good indicators of pozzolanic activity. The physical properties of the mortars revealed a decrease of about 10% in water absorption by immersion, which resulted in improved performance regarding durability, especially with regard to the lower carbonation depth (−1.1 mm), and a decrease of 51% in the chloride diffusion coefficient, even compared to mortars incorporating fly ash. However, the mechanical performance of the mortars incorporating CDW was reduced (25% in terms of flexural strength and 58% in terms of compressive strength), but their practical applicability was never compromised and their mechanical performance proved to be superior to that of mortars incorporating fly ash.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cunha et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: