Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A semi-automated approach improves seabed boulder detection in a study area, suggesting enhanced efficiency for environmental assessments.
The detection of seabed boulders is a critical step in mitigating geological hazards during the planning and construction of offshore wind energy infrastructure, as well as in supporting benthic ecological and palaeoglaciological studies. Traditionally, side-scan sonar (SSS) has been favoured for such detection, but the growing availability of high-resolution multibeam echosounder (MBES) data offers a cost-effective alternative. This study presents a semi-automated, hybrid GIS-AI approach that combines bathymetric position index filtering and a Random Forest classifier to detect boulders and delineate boulder fields from MBES data. The method was tested on a 0.24 km2 site in Long Island Sound using 0.5 m resolution data, achieving 83% recall, 73% precision, and an F1-score of 77—slightly outperforming the average of expert manual picks while offering a substantial improvement in time-efficiency. The workflow was validated against a consensus-based master dataset and applied across a 79 km2 study area, identifying over 75,000 contacts and delineating 89 contact clusters. The method enables objective, reproducible, and scalable boulder detection using only MBES data. Its ability to reduce reliance on SSS surveys while maintaining high accuracy and offering workflow customization makes it valuable for geohazard assessment, benthic habitat mapping, and offshore infrastructure planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Downing et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: