This study demonstrates improved voltage stability and reduced power losses in medium-voltage networks using hybrid BESS and TOU strategies during high photovoltaic penetration levels.
This study investigates the impact of Time-of-Use (TOU) scheduling and battery energy storage systems (BESS) on voltage stability in a typical Malaysian medium-voltage distribution network with high photovoltaic (PV) system penetration. The analyzed network comprises 110 nodes connected via eight feeders to a pair of 132/11 kV, 15 MVA transformers, supplying a total load of 20.006 MVA. Each node is integrated with a 100 kW PV system, enabling up to 100% PV penetration scenarios. A hybrid mitigation strategy combining TOU-based load shifting and BESS was implemented to address voltage violations occurring, particularly during low-load night hours. Dynamic simulations using DIgSILENT PowerFactory were conducted under worst-case (no load and peak load) conditions. The novelty of this research is the use of real rural network data to validate a hybrid BESS–TOU strategy, supported by detailed sensitivity analysis across PV penetration levels. This provides practical voltage stabilization insights not shown in earlier studies. Results show that at 100% PV penetration, TOU or BESS alone are insufficient to fully mitigate voltage drops. However, a hybrid application of 0.4 MWh BESS with 20% TOU load shifting eliminates voltage violations across all nodes, raising the minimum voltage from 0.924 p.u. to 0.951 p.u. while reducing active power losses and grid dependency. A sensitivity analysis further reveals that a 60% PV penetration can be supported reliably using only 0.4 MWh of BESS and 10% TOU. Beyond this, hybrid mitigation becomes essential to maintain stability. The proposed solution demonstrates a scalable approach to enable large-scale PV integration in dense rural grids and addresses the specific operational characteristics of Malaysian networks, which differ from commonly studied IEEE test systems. This work fills a critical research gap by using real local data to propose and validate practical voltage mitigation strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maghami et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: