Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational fluid dynamics reveals Hull Vane® configurations significantly reduce resistance in a patrol vessel, suggesting enhanced efficiency.
This study investigates the effect of Hull Vane® on the total resistance and propulsion performance of a patrol vessel using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Utilizing SHIPFLOW software, multiple simulations were conducted to evaluate how Hull Vane® position and angle of attack influence hydrodynamic performance. A patrol vessel hull form the MAXSURF’s library was selected to investigate resistance and propulsive performance. Nine (9) configurations (named Cases A to I) of the Hull Vane® were examined based on variations in longitudinal position and angle of attack. A grid independence study was conducted to determine the optimal mesh configuration. Validation was performed using the Holtrop–Mennen power prediction method and MAXSURF. According to this study, results indicate that Hull Vane® configurations significantly reduce total resistance and delivered power at higher vessel speeds, with the best improvement in resistance occurring in Case C and in propulsion power in Case B. Propulsive efficiency was maximized in Case E. Furthermore, the study also demonstrates the potential of Hull Vane® as a practical retrofit for enhancing naval vessel performance and reducing energy consumption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rauf et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: