Case study reveals how learning study enhances teachers' engagement with scientific literacy and socially responsible science education in Canada, suggesting effective pedagogical strategies.
Purpose This study explores how secondary science teachers in British Columbia engaged with the Three Visions of Scientific Literacy Heuristic (3-VSL) within a Learning Study (LearnS) to support students’ responsible engagement with controversial societal issues related to science, termed Socially Responsible Science Education (SRSE). The study examined how LearnS promoted teachers’ integration of 3-VSL, addressed SRSE implementation challenges, and developed theoretical fluency in their practice. Design/methodology/approach A case study approach involved three science teachers and a school administrator in a 30-week LearnS. A novel concurrent-and-successive (C&S) LearnS model allowed iterative cycles of lesson planning, enactment, and reflection. Data included semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, artifacts, and meeting recordings. Thematic analysis identified key themes in teachers’ experiences employing 3-VSL. Findings The teachers initially resisted critical orientations of 3-VSL but, through reflection and research lessons, enriched their understandings and enactments of SRSE. They generated personal interpretations of 3-VSL to guide SRSE practices. The 3-VSL framework helped refine literacy-focused objects of learning and guide pedagogy. Practical implications Findings highlight LearnS as an effective professional development model for promoting SRSE. The study demonstrates how 3-VSL scaffolds teacher learning, supports curricular enactment, and addresses context-specific challenges in implementing critically oriented science teaching. Originality/value This study contributes a novel LearnS case from Canada. It expands LearnS beyond variation theory, engages with a complex teaching challenge (SRSE), and introduces a novel LearnS model (C&S). Findings suggest that varying critical components of LearnS—such as objects of learning, theories, models, and contexts—can strengthen its capacity to support diverse teacher aims across educational milieus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fuchs et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: