Secondary analysis shows significant racial differences in seat belt signs identification in pediatric motor vehicle crash victims, indicating potential disparities in safety awareness.
Objective: To determine if there are racial differences in the identification of seat belt signs (SBS) among children with motor vehicle crash (MVC)-related blunt torso trauma. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a de-identified, public-use data set from a Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) prospective cohort study of children with blunt torso trauma between May 2007 and January 2010. Children <18 years in MVCs were included. Patient demographics, documentation of an abdominal SBS presence, MVC crash speed, and restraint status were analyzed. Descriptive statistics, χ 2 analyses, and the Cochran-Armitage test for trend were performed. Results: There were 3832 children in MVCs. The mean age was 10.6 years (SD: 5.5), 52.6% of patients were White, 31.1% Black, 16.3% other/unknown, and 2.3% Asian. Restraint status differed significantly by race ( P <0.001), with 74.1% of White children (95% CI: 72.2%-76.0%), 64.5% of Black children (95% CI: 61.7%-67.2%), 83.0% of Asian children (95% CI: 75.1%-90.8%), and 68.3% of other/unknown race children (95% CI: 64.4%-72.3%) reported as restrained. There was a significant difference in the proportion of restrained Black children with SBS (7.2% [95% CI: 5.3%-9.0%]) compared with White children (27.0% [95% CI: 24.7%-29.2%]) ( P <0.001) and Asian children (26.0% [95% Cl: 16.0%-36.1%]). When adjusting for age, MVC speed, and restraint status, Black patients were 74% less likely than White patients to have SBS observed (OR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.18-0.36). Conclusions: There were significant differences in SBS identification among Black children compared with other race children after MVCs. Prospective studies accounting for skin tone are necessary to further investigate these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gakwaya et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: