Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review demonstrates a regulatory-aligned strategy for quality risk assessments in pharmaceutical manufacturing, emphasizing FMEA's role in risk prioritization.
This review presents a comprehensive, regulatory-aligned strategy for conducting Quality Risk Assessments (QRAs) during New Product Introduction (NPI) in pharmaceutical commercial manufacturing. Focusing on the application of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), the paper offers a practical framework for identifying, evaluating, and mitigating risks across the NPI lifecycle. Leveraging international regulatory guidelines—such as ICH Q9, WHO TRS, PIC/S Annex 20, USFDA, EMA, MHRA, ANVISA, SAHPRA (formerly MCC), and ASEAN GMP standards—the study outlines a systematic and proactive approach to Quality Risk Management (QRM). The FMEA methodology is examined in detail, emphasizing its role in risk prioritization using Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs), integration with the Pharmaceutical Quality System (PQS), and alignment with regulatory expectations for validation, cleaning, documentation, and supply chain readiness. Key failure modes, causes, and mitigations related to process scale-up, analytical method transfer, raw material variability, cleaning validation, packaging integrity, and transport logistics are outlined. Additionally, a structured FMEA template is introduced, supporting consistent, objective risk evaluations across multidisciplinary teams. This FMEA-driven model enhances decision-making, ensures compliance, and improves patient safety during the transition from development to commercial scale.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nikhil Arun Vyawhare (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: