Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluation framework assesses zero-dose reduction strategies in Madagascar, highlighting community insights and program impact.
Despite growing global momentum to reduce the number of children who never received a dose of any vaccine, i.e., zero-dose (ZD) children, persistent geographic and social inequities continue to undermine progress toward universal immunization coverage. In Madagascar, where routine vaccination coverage remains below 50% in most regions, the non-governmental organization Doctors for Madagascar and public sector partners are implementing the SOAMEVA program: a targeted community-based initiative to identify and reach ZD children in sixteen underserved districts in the country’s south. This paper outlines the equity-sensitive evaluation design developed to assess the implementation and impact of SOAMEVA. It presents a forward-looking evaluation framework that integrates both quantitative program monitoring and qualitative community insights. By focusing at the fokontany level—the smallest administrative unit in Madagascar—the evaluation captures small-scale variation in ZD prevalence and program reach, allowing for a detailed analysis of disparities often masked in aggregated data. Importantly, the evaluation includes structured feedback loops with community health workers and caregivers, surfacing local knowledge on barriers to immunization access and program adoption. It also tracks real-time adaptations to implementation strategy across diverse contexts, offering insight into how routine immunization programs can be made more responsive, sustainable, and equitable. We propose eight design principles for conducting equity-sensitive evaluation of immunization programs in similar fragile settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Demare et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: