Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study reveals minimal taper and blind hole formation in heat-resistant steel with varied pulse energy and width.
Millisecond lasers, with their high processing efficiency and large power, are widely used in manufacturing fields such as aerospace. This study aims to investigate the effects of different processing parameters on the micro-hole processing of 316 heat-resistant steel using millisecond lasers. Through the control variable method, the study examines the impact of pulse energy, pulse count, and pulse width on the quality of micro-holes, including the entrance diameter, exit diameter, and taper. Furthermore, combined with orthogonal experiments and COMSOL Multiphysics 6.2 simulations, the study explores the influence of pulse width on the formation of blind holes. The experimental results show that when the pulse energy is 2.2 J, the taper is minimal (2.2°), while the taper reaches its peak (2.4°) at 2.4 J pulse energy. As the pulse count increases to 55–60 pulses, the exit diameter stabilizes, and the taper decreases to 1.8°. Blind holes begin to form when the pulse width exceeds 1.2 ms. When the pulse width is 1.2 ms, pulse energy is 2.4 J, and pulse count is 50, the entrance diameter of the blind hole reaches its maximum, indicating that longer pulse widths result in more significant energy reflection and thermal accumulation effects. COMSOL simulations reveal that high-energy pulses cause intense melt ejection, while longer pulse widths exacerbate thermal accumulation at the micro-hole entrance, leading to blind hole formation. This study provides important process references for laser processing of through-holes and blind holes in heat-resistant steel.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: