Retrospective study identifies risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in Crohn’s disease patients, indicating the nomogram's potential for clinical use.
Background Massive postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding is a severe postoperative complication of Crohn’s disease (CD) with a high mortality rate, and deteriorating patients’ recovery. However, there are few related studies, and it lacks effective prevention measures. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter study to explore the risk factors for massive postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding in CD patients. Methods This study was a multicenter retrospective case-control study. Patients who were diagnosed with CD and underwent gastrointestinal (GI) surgery were enrolled. The control group was matched 1:4 for gender and age. By comparing perioperative medical information between two groups, risk factors were identified through logistic regression analysis. A nomogram was constructed and internal validation was performed by bootstrap resampling. Results A total of 170 patients were included. Multivariable logistic regression revealed the independent predictors of massive postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding involving the number of previous abdominal surgeries (OR = 2.56, 95% CI = 1.54–4.24), GI bleeding history (OR = 6.17, 95% CI = 1.59–23.97), serum albumin (ALB) (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.81–0.96), and Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.08–2.29). The nomogram achieved an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.76–0.93). In internal validation, the AUC value was 0.976 (95% CI: 0.955–0.997). Calibration curves showed good alignment. DCA demonstrated that the diagnostic model had good clinical efficiency. Conclusion The risk of massive postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding in CD patients will be increased with a GI bleeding history, more previous abdominal surgeries, higher nutrition risk, and lower ALB level. Our nomogram model is effective and could be a useful tool for prediction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: