Multi-site analysis reveals GPT-4o detects in-hospital cardiac arrests effectively, suggesting open-source models are viable alternatives.
In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) affects over 200,000 patients annually in the United States, yet its detection through manual chart review remains resource-intensive and often delayed. We evaluated the performance of four open-source large language models (LLMs) and GPT-4o in identifying IHCA cases from 2,674 clinical notes across five hospitals. While GPT-4o achieved the highest performance (F1-score: 0.90, recall: 0.97), several open-source models demonstrated comparable capabilities, suggesting their viability for clinical applications. Our systematic analysis of model outputs revealed that performance was strongly influenced by site-specific documentation practices, with inter-site agreement rates varying by over 20%. Through detailed error analysis, we identified key challenges including medical terminology hallucinations and structural inconsistencies in model reasoning. These findings establish a framework for implementing LLM-based IHCA detection systems while highlighting critical considerations for their clinical deployment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vurgun et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: