Systematic analysis reveals progress in aortic interventions and therapy in Latin America, indicating challenges remain.
Background The global adoption of endovascular aortic techniques has progressed rapidly, yet the extent of Latin America’s participation in this revolution requires comprehensive evaluation. This review examines the region’s current capabilities, innovations, and barriers in aortic endovascular therapy. Methods We conducted a systematic analysis of published experiences and institutional reports from across Latin America, focusing on three key areas: ascending/arch aortic interventions, thoracoabdominal repairs, and endoleak management strategies. Results The region has demonstrated significant progress in adopting complex endovascular therapies despite resource limitations. Several centers have successfully implemented advanced techniques, including total percutaneous arch repairs, hybrid debranching procedures, and customized endograft solutions. Experience with thoracoabdominal pathologies shows promising outcomes with fenestrated and branched endografts, while innovative approaches to endoleak management have been developed, particularly for challenging type II and III cases. However, variability in outcomes persists due to disparities in technology access, training opportunities, and follow-up protocols. The available evidence, while growing, remains largely limited to single-center experiences with modest sample sizes. Conclusion Latin America has made measurable strides in aortic endovascular therapy, demonstrating both technical capability and innovative adaptations to local challenges. The establishment of a Latin American Aortic Registry (LATAR) would address critical gaps in data standardization, facilitate outcome benchmarking, and promote equitable technology dissemination. Such structured collaboration is essential for the region to fully participate in the global advancement of aortic care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cubas et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: