Comprehensive review highlights GC-MS methods for identifying micropollutants in wastewater, indicating their ecological significance.
The analysis of wastewater is essential in environmental chemistry, particularly for monitoring emerging contaminants and assessing ecological impacts. In this context, hyphenated chromatographic techniques are widely used, with liquid chromatography being one of the most common. However, gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) remains a valuable tool in this field due to its sensitivity, selectivity, and widespread availability in most laboratories. This review examines the application of validated methods for wastewater analysis using GC-MS (MS), highlighting its relevance in identifying micropollutants such as pharmaceuticals, drugs of abuse, pesticides, hormones, and industrial by-products. The validation of analytical methods is crucial to ensuring the reliability and reproducibility of data and the accurate monitoring of contaminants. Key parameters, including sample volume, recovery efficiency, and detection and quantification limits, are discussed, evaluating different approaches to optimising the identification of different classes of contaminants. Additionally, this study explores advances in sample preparation techniques, such as solid-phase microextraction (SPME), dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME), and solid-phase extraction (SPE), which enhance efficiency and minimise interferences in the analysis. Finally, future perspectives are discussed, including the integration of emerging technologies such as high-resolution mass spectrometry, the miniaturisation of GC systems, and the development of faster and more sustainable analytical methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Catarro et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: