Clinical-theoretical essay analyzes individual autonomy conflicts with collective morality, suggesting moral discretion may be necessary.
This clinical-theoretical essay, structured in the format of a reflective scientific article, analyzesthe growing conflict between public morality and individual ethics in the contemporary Brazilianpsychosocial context. Based on four decades of psychiatric and psychotherapeutic practice, andenriched by philosophical, psychological, and sociopolitical theory, the work defends thestrategic necessity of moral discretion—and at times, of lying—as a survival mechanism in theface of collective moral simplification. The text proposes that, under excessive social andpolitical control, moral action and individual initiative become publicly condemned andinstitutionally impossible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marcelo Caixeta (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: