Systematic review demonstrates HPE models improve posture monitoring and reduce musculoskeletal symptoms in workplaces, indicating their value in ergonomic risk assessment.
This study presents a PRISMA-based systematic review and meta-analysis of HPE applications for ergonomic risk assessment and workplace safety. The findings indicate that HPE models offer a non-invasive, scalable solution for monitoring worker posture and identifying ergonomic risks. The systematic review highlighted the potential of HPE models in improving workplace safety by providing real-time posture monitoring and ergonomic risk assessment. Studies using OpenPose, MediaPipe, and AlphaPose demonstrated high accuracy in detecting posture deviations, with mean errors ranging from less than 2 mm RMSE to over 70 mm PA-MPJPE, depending on environmental conditions and body regions tracked. The meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction in MSD prevalence due to ergonomic interventions, with a standardized mean difference of −0.71 in pre-post studies and −0.91 in controlled trials. Studies implementing workstation adjustments, ergonomic training, and real-time feedback, showed the highest improvements in posture correction and risk mitigation, consistently reducing musculoskeletal symptoms across workplace settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iyer et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: