Systematic analysis shows molecular biology methods improve bloodstream infection diagnosis, indicating faster treatments.
Bloodstream infection (BSI) is a critical condition with extremely high mortality. Rapid and accurate diagnosis is crucial for effective treatment. The traditional blood culture (BC) method has issues, such as long testing times and limited sensitivity, making it challenging to meet the need for timely diagnosis. To address this problem, various molecular biology methods for directly detecting blood samples (whole blood, plasma, serum, and positive BC samples) have emerged. These include Raman spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, nucleic acid amplification, and hybridization techniques (such as the CRISPR/Cas system, digital droplet PCR (ddPCR), and T2 magnetic resonance (T2MR)), biosensors, and next-generation sequencing (NGS). These methods can quickly identify pathogens and their drug-resistant markers, significantly reducing diagnostic delays and helping to provide earlier targeted treatment. This article systematically analyzes the principles, advantages, and disadvantages of these advanced techniques, explores their value in revolutionizing the BSI diagnostic model, and looks ahead to future development directions, providing a reference for research and clinical applications in this field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: