This work demonstrates the impact of pyrolysis atmosphere and temperature on biochar properties from Agave wercklei, suggesting improved carbon sequestration in semi-arid regions.
Biochar has emerged as a scalable negative emission technology with promising agronomic and environmental benefits. In this context, arid and semi-arid regions represent promising zones for carbon removal through soil biochar application, particularly when exploring new non-food biomass sources with high energy potential, such Agave wercklei. This study aims to evaluate the properties of biochars produced from Agave wercklei and its potential in carbon capture in semi-arid region. Additionally, this work also investigated the role of pyrolysis atmosphere by comparing nitrogen (N2) and recirculated pyrolysis gas (PyGR) across four temperatures (350, 425, 500, and 575 ºC). PyGR-based biochars exhibited higher carbon content (up to 71.36%), energy density, and enriched surface chemistry with increased aliphatic functional groups, retention of dissolved organic carbon, while N2-based biochars showed greater aromaticity, higher thermal stability, and lower content of volatile compounds. Differences were also observed in handling and interfacial properties, with PyGR-based biochars presenting superior flowability and higher hydrophobicity, while N2-based biochars exhibited greater water retention. Multivariate analysis revealed that the pyrolysis atmosphere plays a crucial rule in key indicators, including atomic ratios (H/C, O/C), aromatic indices, and thermal degradation profiles. Thus, the use of inert gas in bench-scale studies may thus misrepresent the carbon permanence and agronomic behavior of biochars produced under realistic industrial conditions. Furthermore, Agave wercklei demonstrated favorable biochar properties, positioning it as a valuable biomass for carbon removal in semi-arid regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: