PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 31, 2025Heritage21 citationsOpen Access

HBIM and Information Management for Knowledge and Conservation of Architectural Heritage: A Review

View Full Paper
MPMaria ParenteNBN. BrunoFOFederica Ottoni

Key Points

  • Main finding emphasizes the integration of non-geometric data alongside geometric modeling in hbim.
  • Data enrichment phase includes historical, diagnostic, and conservation information to support architectural heritage.
  • The systematic bibliometric analysis identifies trends in publication types and research focuses in the field.
  • Critical evaluation of information management methods reveals their advantages and limitations for heritage conservation.

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive review of research on Historic Building Information Modeling (HBIM), focusing on its role as a tool for managing knowledge and supporting conservation practices of Architectural Heritage. While previous review articles and most research works have predominantly addressed geometric modeling—given its significant challenges in the context of historic buildings—this study places greater emphasis on the integration of non-geometric data within the BIM environment. A systematic search was conducted in the Scopus database to extract the 451 relevant publications analyzed in this review, covering the period from 2008 to mid-2024. A bibliometric analysis was first performed to identify trends in publication types, geographic distribution, research focuses, and software usage. The main body of the review then explores three core themes in the development of the information system: the definition of model entities, both semantic and geometric; the data enrichment phase, incorporating historical, diagnostic, monitoring and conservation-related information; and finally, data use and sharing, including on-site applications and interoperability. For each topic, the review highlights and discusses the principal approaches documented in the literature, critically evaluating the advantages and limitations of different information management methods with respect to the distinctive features of the building under analysis and the specific objectives of the information model.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Parente et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a094be6551bb0af8cf22fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8080306
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Procedure for Safety Assessment and BIM Modelling of an Historical Complex Structure through a Macroelement Approach: The Building “Molino-Pastificio Soresi” of Partinico (Italy)2022 · 5 citations
  2. 2H-BIM and Artificial Intelligence: Classification of Architectural Heritage for Semi-Automatic Scan-to-BIM Reconstruction2023 · 98 citations
  3. 3BIM goals and uses in the management, maintenance, and preservation of historic buildings: an open access perspective. Implementation characteristics of HBIM for improved documentation and lifecycle management2025 · 6 citations
  4. 4Systematic approach to generate Historical Building Information Modelling (HBIM) in architectural restoration project2022 · 108 citations
  5. 5The Evolution of Interactivity, Immersion and Interoperability in HBIM: Digital Model Uses, VR and AR for Built Cultural Heritage2021 · 131 citations