Comprehensive review highlights organoids and spheroids as critical tools in thyroid cancer, suggesting new avenues for precision oncology.
Organoid and spheroid technologies have rapidly become pivotal in thyroid cancer research, offering models that are more physiologically relevant than traditional two-dimensional culture. In the study of papillary and anaplastic thyroid carcinomas, two subtypes that differ both histologically and clinically, three-dimensional (3D) models offer unparalleled insights into tumor biology, therapeutic vulnerabilities, and resistance mechanisms. These models maintain essential tumor characteristics such as cellular diversity, spatial structure, and interactions with the microenvironment, making them extremely valuable for disease modeling and drug testing. This review emphasizes recent progress in the development and use of thyroid cancer organoids and spheroids, focusing on their role in replicating disease features, evaluating targeted therapies, and investigating epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), cancer stem cell behavior, and treatment resistance. Patient-derived organoids have shown potential in capturing individualized drug responses, supporting precision oncology strategies for both differentiated and aggressive subtypes. Additionally, new platforms, such as thyroid organoid-on-a-chip systems, provide dynamic, high-fidelity models for functional studies and assessments of endocrine disruption. Despite ongoing challenges, such as standardization, limited inclusion of immune and stromal components, and culture reproducibility, advancements in microfluidics, biomaterials, and machine learning have enhanced the clinical and translational potential of these systems. Organoids and spheroids are expected to become essential in the future of thyroid cancer research, particularly in bridging the gap between laboratory discoveries and patient-focused therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gulwani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: