Complications Following Percutaneous Epidural Neuroplasty: A Narrative Review of Clinical Evidence and the Rationale for Post-Procedural 6 h Inpatient Monitoring Amid Limited Systematic Data

Background: Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN) and related adhesiolysis procedures are widely used for managing chronic spinal pain. Although generally safe, complications—ranging from minor to life-threatening—have been reported. This review aimed to estimate the incidence and characteristics of complications following PEN and to evaluate the medical rationale for post-procedural inpatient monitoring. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published from January 2000 to April 2025 reporting complications associated with PEN. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis on five eligible cohort studies to estimate the pooled complication rate and evaluated heterogeneity. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results: Five cohort studies (n = 1740) were included in the meta-analysis, with a pooled complication rate of 9.0% (95% CI: 4.8–13.1%, I2 = 97.5%). A total of 133 complications were identified from cohort studies and case reports. Mechanical and neurological complications were most common. Serious complications, including hematoma, meningitis, and cardiopulmonary arrest, were concentrated within the first 6 h post-procedure. Conclusions: This meta-analysis highlights a quantifiable risk of complications associated with PEN. Our findings support structured inpatient monitoring during the immediate post-procedural period to enhance safety and outcomes.