PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 2025Water24 citationsOpen Access

Drought Analysis Methods: A Multidisciplinary Review with Insights on Key Decision-Making Factors in Method Selection

View Full Paper
AAAbdul Baqi AhadyEKElena‐Maria KlopriesHSHolger Schüttrumpf

Key Points

  • A unified framework integrates multiple drought analysis methods to improve decision-making.
  • Five key methods evaluated include index-based, remote sensing, and impact-based approaches.
  • Scientific publication trends show how drought analysis methods have evolved over time and regions.
  • Insights are provided for optimizing method selection to enhance drought research and policy implementation.

Abstract

Drought is one of the most complex natural hazards, characterized by its slow onset, persistent nature, diverse sectoral impacts (e.g., agriculture, water resources, ecosystems), and dependence on meteorological, hydrological, and socioeconomic factors. Over the years, significant scientific effort has been devoted to developing methodologies that address its multifaceted nature, reflecting the interdisciplinary challenges of drought analysis. However, previous reviews have typically focused on individual methods, while this study presents a unified, multidisciplinary framework that integrates multiple drought analysis methods and links them to key factors guiding method selection. To address this gap, five widely used methods—index-based, remote sensing, threshold-level methods (TLM), impact-based methods, and the storyline approach—are critically evaluated from a multidisciplinary perspective. In addition, the study examines spatial and temporal trends in scientific publications, illustrating how the application of these methods has evolved over time and across regions. The primary objective of this review is twofold: (1) to provide a holistic, state-of-the-art synthesis of these methods, their applications, and their limitations; and (2) to evaluate and prioritize the critical decision-making factors, including drought type, data type/availability, study scale, and management objectives that influence method selection. By bridging this gap, the paper offers a conceptual decision-support framework for selecting context-appropriate drought analysis methods. However, challenges remain, including the vast diversity of methods beyond the scope of this review and the limited consideration of less influential factors such as user expertise, computational resources, and policy context. The paper concludes with insights and recommendations for optimizing method selection under varying circumstances, aiming to support both drought research and effective policy implementation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ahady et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a0c6be6551bb0af8cff1ahttps://doi.org/10.3390/w17152248
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The SMOS Soil Moisture Retrieval Algorithm2012 · 1,047 citations
  2. 2Active and Passive Electro-Optical Sensors for Health Assessment in Food Crops2020 · 58 citations
  3. 3Drought propagation in karst and non-karst regions in Southwest China compared on a daily scale2023 · 11 citations
  4. 4Comparison of different threshold level methods for drought propagation analysis in Germany2016 · 126 citations
  5. 5Drought indices and indicators revisited2019 · 230 citations