Supplemental Figure S3 from State-Specific Incidence of Endometrial Cancer in the United States by Histologic Subtype Corrected for Hysterectomy Prevalence from 2010 to 2019

Megan A. Clarke; Jared A. Fisher; Nicolas Wentzensen; Akemi T. Wijayabahu; Rebecca C. Arend; Rena R. Jones; Britt Erickson

doi:10.1158/1055-9965.29760932

August 1, 2025

Supplemental Figure S3 from State-Specific Incidence of Endometrial Cancer in the United States by Histologic Subtype Corrected for Hysterectomy Prevalence from 2010 to 2019

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

MAIN FINDING: Non-endometrial endometrial cancer incidence varies significantly across states.
KEY EVIDENCE: The ranking changes when adjusting data for hysterectomy prevalence, affecting state comparisons.
APPROACH: Analysis employed incidence data from 2010 to 2019 across various states in the United States.
SIGNIFICANCE: Understanding incidence variations helps in targeted public health strategies and resources allocation.

Implication

Figure ranks top 10 states for non-endometrial cancer incidence, before and after adjusting for hysterectomy, indicating regional health differences.

Abstract

This figure shows the ranking of the top 10 states based on the highest incidence of non-endometrioid endometrial cancer, before (left hand side) and after (right hand side) hysterectomy

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Clarke et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a0c72e6551bb0af8d0150 https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.29760932

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Supplemental Figure S3 from State-Specific Incidence of Endometrial Cancer in the United States by Histologic Subtype Corrected for Hysterectomy Prevalence from 2010 to 2019

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Supplemental Figure S3 from State-Specific Incidence of Endometrial Cancer in the United States by Histologic Subtype Corrected for Hysterectomy Prevalence from 2010 to 2019

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading