Natural cross-over design examines running distances and perceived exertion in soccer players at altitude and sea level, indicating significant differences.
Purpose There is limited real-world data on differential perceptions of exertion in professional soccer at altitude. In a natural cross-over design, we quantified responses to training and matches at sea level and altitude. Methods Total, and high-speed, running distance and differential session ratings of perceived exertion for breathlessness (s-RPE-B) and leg exertion (s-RPE-L) were collected from 19 professional soccer players (age: 27.3 ± 3.4 years, stature: 181.2 ± 5.9cm, mass: 78.7 ± 8.1kg) at sea-level and altitude. Data were collected for matches raining sessions one and two days pre match. Results Differences between altitude conditions were estimated through mixed-linear modeling, with 95% confidence intervals representing values highly compatible with our observed data. In matches, total distance may have been reduced (95% confidence intervals 43 to -833 m, surprisal [s] = 3.74) and s-RPE-B may have increased (-0.6 to 10.7, s = 3.66) at altitude. A clear perceptual shift was observed with s-RPE-B increasing relative to s-RPE-L (-13.4 to -7.17, s >13) at altitude. Training at altitude included higher total (318 to 661 m, s > 13), and high-speed (33.1 to 93 m, s > 13), running distances but s-RPE-L reduced (-14.2 to -1.01, s = 5.39) and s-RPE-B increased relative to s-RPE-L (-15.1 to -3.93, s = 10.3). Conclusions Our key finding was breathlessness increased relative to leg exertion at altitude.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Draper et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: