The persistence of personal identity through the complete turnover of its biological substrate is afoundational paradox in philosophy and neuroscience. This paper introduces a novel,quantitative framework that moves this problem from philosophical debate to the realm ofempirical science. We model identity as classical information preserved across a multi-timescalebiological hierarchy. We document the theory’s evolution, including the rigorous falsification ofan initial quantum-gravitational model, and the subsequent development of a classicalframework. This classical model initially failed a comprehensive validation suite with a 41.5%score due to a miscalibrated testing methodology that misinterpreted massive biological safetymargins as failures. Through a process of algorithmic refinement and methodological correction,the framework’s validity was transformed, achieving a 96.5% overall score. The validated modeldemonstrates 86.0% predictive accuracy, is fully testable with current technology, and makesspecific, falsifiable predictions. This work offers the first mechanistic, computationally-groundedtheory for the identity-turnover paradox, a clear clinical translation roadmap, and a robustmethodology for future research.
Rod Rodriguez (Mon,) studied this question.