Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pharmacological characterization reveals that venom peptides inhibit potassium currents in neurons, suggesting therapeutic potential for insect paralysis.
Abstract Little is known about the venom of Salticidae spiders, so here, we look for venom peptides of the most cosmopolitan spider, Phidippus audax. The isolation, chemical synthesis, and pharmacological characterization of a short peptide from the venom of the spider Phidippus audax (Araneae: Salticidae) was unveiled. The peptide (Paudax1) consists of 22 residues and contains a single disulfide bridge. Paudax1 has paralytic activity against Acheta domesticus. It was synthesized in two N-terminal forms, Phi-Ala and Phi-Trp, which were also paralytic to house crickets. The pharmacology of both homologous peptides was evaluated in primary cultures of rat dorsal root ganglia neurons. Microperfusion of Phi-Ala [10 µM] (n = 6) resulted in a 17 ± 5% inhibition of the maximum amplitude of the outward current (p < 0.05) and a non-significant decrease of 22 ± 7% (p > 0.05) in the current amplitude at the end of the voltage pulse (IKend). Additionally, Phi-Ala did not affect the current inactivation time course (τinact). Meanwhile, the peptide Phi-Trp [10 µM] (n = 6) induced a 37 ± 3.6% inhibition (p ≤ 0.01) of the maximum amplitude of the outward current and a 44 ± 5% inhibition (p ≤ 0.01) in IKend, with no change in τinact. Although both peptides, Phi-Ala and Phi-Trp, displayed insect paralytic activity, they exhibited relatively low efficiency as blockers of the outward current at the concentrations used, and they did not affect the inward currents. Phi-Trp and Phi-Ala are worth investigating to explore their therapeutic potential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salceda et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: