Institutional analysis reveals drivers and impacts of protected agriculture in Sri Lanka, suggesting pathways for improvement.
The emerging research on the sustainability of protected agriculture in the global South is fragmented, and fails to explore comprehensively the underlying dynamics of the sector. Our aim is to unravel these dynamics through an institutional analysis and expert interviews ( n = 26) that shed light on the current status of protected agriculture in Sri Lanka, as well as the perceived drivers, impacts, challenges, and pathways to enhance its sustainability. Results suggest that protected agriculture has both positive (e.g., income generation, resource use) and negative sustainability impacts (e.g., high investment, polyethylene use, pollution). Despite its potential to contribute to the sustainable intensification of the agricultural sector in Sri Lanka, there are several constraints that prevent its widespread adoption, mainly due to high upfront costs and external shocks. Responses that could increase the uptake of protected agriculture and increase its sustainability in the country include (a) implementing cost reduction measures, (b) scaling up knowledge transfer and market diversification, (c) mitigating negative sustainability impacts, and (d) adopting evidence‐based systemic planning approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rathnabarana et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: