Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Perspective highlights challenges in biomarker discovery through machine learning in clinical proteomics, suggesting better practices.
Machine learning holds significant promise for accelerating biomarker discovery in clinical proteomics, yet its real-world impact remains limited by widespread methodological pitfalls and unrealistic expectations. In this perspective, we critically examine the application of machine learning for biomarker discovery in clinical proteomics, emphasizing that algorithmic novelty alone cannot compensate for issues such as small sample sizes, batch effects, overfitting, data leakage, and poor model generalization. We caution against the uncritical application of complex models, such as deep learning architectures, that often exacerbate these problems, offering limited interpretability and negligible performance gains in typical clinical proteomics datasets. Instead, we advocate for the realistic and responsible use of machine learning, grounded in rigorous study design, appropriate validation strategies, and transparent, reproducible modeling practices. Emphasizing simplicity, interpretability, and domain awareness over hype-driven complexity is essential if machine learning is to fulfill its translational potential in the clinic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adams et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: