Observational study finds lateral wall collapse reduces efficacy of hypoglossal nerve stimulation in obstructive sleep apnea, suggesting airflow analysis may improve patient selection.
Rationale Patient selection for hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) requires assessment of pharyngeal site of collapse using drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE). Objectives The current study aims to address two key knowledge gaps: First, we prospectively confirm that, among HGNS candidates, reduced HGNS efficacy is associated with oropharyngeal lateral wall (OLW) collapse (Aim 1). Second, given DISE is resource-intensive procedure and delays treatment, we evaluate whether a recently-developed non-invasive method for identifying OLW collapse using airflow shapes is associated with reduced HGNS efficacy (Aim 2). Methods Patients who underwent DISE, HGNS implantation, and follow-up sleep testing were included in Aim 1 (n=369) as part of an observational cohort study. For Aim 2, airflow data estimating OLW collapse probability were collected during DISE via pneumotachograph (n=138, DISE Flow cohort); and from a home sleep test via nasal cannula for validation (n=46, HST cohort). Linear regression quantified associations between HGNS efficacy (%reduction in AHI) and DISE-determined OLW collapse (Aim 1) or flow-shape-determined OLW collapse (probability score per 2SD; Aim 2), adjusting for baseline AHI. Results Compared to non-OLW collapse, DISE-determined OLW collapse reduced HGNS efficacy [95%CI] by ‒18.0[‒31.9,‒6.2]%. Increased flow-shape-determined OLW collapse probability (Δ2SD) was associated with reduced HGNS efficacy in both DISE Flow (‒24.8 [‒40.4, ‒11.7]%) and HST (‒22.7 [‒50.0, ‒2.6]%) cohorts. Conclusion This study prospectively validates OLW collapse as a key factor in HGNS failure and shows that airflow-based identification of OLW collapse can effectively estimate HGNS efficacy, representing a significant advancement in patient selection for HGNS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vena et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: