Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
First-principles theory connects structure to efficacy-toxicity in small-molecule drugs, suggesting improved predictions.
The high clinical failure rate of small-molecule drugs is inarguably attributable to the lack of reliable predictions of chemical structure-efficacy-toxicity relationships that are applicable to native physiological conditions in humans. Existing predictions rely on empirical models of structure-free energy and structure-activity/property relationships derived from equilibrium data that break down under native nonequilibrium, nonlinear dynamic cellular conditions (where noncovalent inter- and intramolecular state transitions are governed strictly by free energy barriers (ΔG‡)). We have developed a first-principles, physics-based theory that connects the dots between (1) structure and ΔG‡ via the desolvation and resolvation costs of entering and exiting noncovalent intra- and intermolecular states, respectively; (2) ΔG‡, PK, and dynamic fractional drug-target and off-target occupancy (denoted as γ(t)); and (3) γ(t) and pharmaco- and toxicodynamic behaviors. Here, we overview our theory, together with its reduction to practice and potential to facilitate greatly improved predictions of human-relevant chemical structure-efficacy/toxicity relationships.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pearlstein et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: