Evaluation study compares machine learning algorithms for blood-based markers in multiple sclerosis, suggesting setups influence outcomes.
Studies of blood-based markers in multiple sclerosis using machine learning for classification use widely varying methods. Here different configurations of machine learning algorithms, feature selection methods, and evaluation approaches were compared. Logistic Regression with Random Forests for feature selection and 10-fold cross-validation classified best, features depended on selection methods, and cross-validation data splits were heterogeneous. This suggests experimental setups influence classification and selected markers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vlieger et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: