Long-term physical activity profiles are explored in cancer survivors post-exercise intervention, suggesting targeted support is needed for specific groups.
Regular physical activity improves health outcomes in cancer survivors; however, maintaining recommended levels of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) post-treatment is challenging, even for those participating in exercise intervention studies. Understanding long-term MVPA patterns and predictors can guide strategies to promote sustained physical activity in this population. We aimed to describe objectively measured MVPA-profiles over 5 years in cancer survivors who participated in a 6-month exercise intervention during cancer treatment, and to identify baseline predictors of profile belonging. Data were derived from the multicenter randomized controlled trial Phys-Can, including participants with breast, colorectal or prostate cancer. Objective measures of MVPA were conducted at baseline, post-intervention, and at 1-, 2-, and 5-year follow-ups. Longitudinal latent profile analysis was used to identify MVPA profiles, and multinomial logistic regression to examine potential baseline predictors of profile belonging. Among 556 participants, 4 longitudinal MVPA profiles were identified: Low and stable (18.0%), Medium and stable (40.8%), High and decreasing (28.4%), and Very high and stable (12.8%). Compared to the Very high and stable MVPA profile, participants in the Low and stable MVPA profile were more likely to be women (OR = 20.64) or have higher BMI (OR = 1.41) or lower cardiorespiratory fitness (OR = 0.69) at baseline. Cancer survivors who are women or have a higher BMI and/or low cardiorespiratory fitness prior to cancer treatment are at greater risk of maintaining low MVPA levels over time. These groups may require targeted support to enhance and sustain physical activity during survivorship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ax et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: