Non-randomised controlled trial compares two interventions on physical behaviours in office workers, indicating no significant advantage of 24-hour time-use approach.
Background Physical behaviours over a 24-hour period are important for health. However, we do not know if interventions using a “24-hour time-use approach” are more effective in improving 24-hour time-use behaviours than the traditional “reduce sitting at work approach”. Thus, the aim of our non-randomised controlled study was to investigate this in a high-risk group of overweight and obese Brazilian office workers. Methods Forty-five office workers were allocated to three non-randomised controlled groups; “Reduce sitting at work” ( n = 15) receiving an intervention focused on reducing sitting time at work; the “24-hour” ( n = 15) receiving an intervention aiming to reduce sitting at work as well as promoting behavioural changes around 24 hours (e.g., sedentary lifestyle, benefits of physical activity, and healthy sleep hygiene); or “control” ( n = 15) without any intervention. Daily time spent in physical behaviours (sitting, standing, active, and in bed) was monitored for 7 days using a thigh-worn accelerometer at baseline, and at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Intervention effects were analysed using linear mixed models, adjusted for baseline values, age, and sex, with a compositional data analysis approach. Results At baseline, the demographic characteristics and 24-hour physical behaviours of the groups were similar. No significant intervention effect was observed between the intervention groups for the overall 24-hour composition, except for time-in-bed, which decreased for Reduce sitting at work compared to 24-hour group from baseline to the 6-month follow-up ( p -value = 0.02). Compared to the control group, both intervention approaches resulted in less time spent sitting, more time standing, and less time-in-bed from baseline to the 3-month follow-up, but these effects were not sustained at the 6-month follow-up. Notably, domain-specific (i.e., work and leisure) analysis revealed that most changes in the overall 24-hour composition occurred due to changes in behaviours during working hours. Conclusions Among Brazilian overweight and obese office workers, the “24-hour time-use approach” may not lead to better improvements in overall 24-hour composition of physical behaviours compared to the traditional “reduce sitting at work approach”.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brusaca et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: