In this study, we combined automatically generated labels from large language models (LLMs) with a small number of manual annotations to classify adverse event-related treatment discontinuations in Japanese EHRs. By fine-tuning JMedRoBERTa and T5 on 6,156 LLM-labeled records and 200 manually labeled samples and then evaluating on a 100-record test set, T5 achieved a precision of 0.83, albeit with a recall of only 0.25. We noted that when training solely on the 200 human-labeled samples (that contained significantly few positive cases), the model failed to detect any adverse events, making a reliable measurement of precision or recall infeasible (that is, N/A). This underscores the potential of large-scale LLM-driven labeling as well as the need to improve recall and label quality in practical clinical scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ito et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: