Experiments identify optimal dosages and combinations with ceftriaxone, suggesting effective treatments for mycobacterium abscessus lung disease.
Background. Guideline-based therapy achieves sputum culture conversion rates in 20-34% of patients with Mycobacterium abscessus (MAB) lung disease (LD). Double-beta-lactam combinations have been proposed to improve cure, based on time-kill curves. Methods. We performed minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) experiments followed by HFS-MAB exposure-effect studies with sulbactam-durlobactam administered every 8h (q8h), q12h, and q24h, to identify target exposures. Next, the sulbactam-durlobactam target exposure plus ceftriaxone was administered in the HFS-MAB inoculated with MAB clinical isolates, as was the sulbactam-durlobactam-ceftriaxone combination with epetraborole and omadacycline (SDCEO). gamma-slopes (kill-speed) were calculated for all regimens. The minimal sulbactam-durlobactam clinical doses that would achieve target exposure were identified using Monte Carlo experiments. Results. Ceftriaxone reduced sulbactam-durlobactam MICs by 8-tube dilutions. Sulbactam-durlobactam microbial kill and antimicrobial resistance were linked to % time concentration persists above MIC (%TMIC), with target exposure of 50%. Sulbactam-durlobactam killed 3.85 log10 CFU/mL below day 0 burden (B0) with regrowth. Sulbactam-durlobactam-ceftriaxone killed without regrowth. Sulbactam-durlobactam and ceftriaxone demonstrated Bliss additivity. The kill-speed of bacterial population in >95% of virtual subjects was 2.28 (0.97-4.80) log10 CFU kill/day for sulbactam-durlobactam-ceftriaxone and 2.91 (1.65-4.93) log10 CFU kill/day for SDCEO. The optimal sulbactam-durlobactam dose co-administered with ceftriaxone was 2G q8h for creatinine clearance >90 mL/min, 2G q12h for 60-90 mL/min, 1G q12h for ≥30 to <60 mL/min, and 1G q24h for <30 mL/min. Conclusion. Sulbactam-durlobactam-ceftriaxone achieved the highest microbial kill encountered so far in the HFS-MAB. Sulbactam-durlobactam-ceftriaxone should be tested in clinical trials as the backbone for novel treatment shortening regimens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: