Observational study shows significant reduction in exacerbations and corticosteroid use in patients with severe asthma, indicating mepolizumab's effectiveness.
Background Although clinical trial evidence exists, there is limited awareness of the real-world effectiveness of mepolizumab in patients with severe asthma and blood eosinophil counts (BEC) ≥150–<300 cells/μL. Methods REALITI-A, an international, prospective, single-arm, observational cohort study enrolled patients with severe asthma initiating mepolizumab. Outcomes assessed over 2 years pre- versus post-mepolizumab exposure included clinically significant exacerbations (CSEs), maintenance oral corticosteroid (mOCS) use, Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-5 scores, and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ). Results After 2 years of mepolizumab treatment, compared with pre-exposure, the proportion of patients with BEC ≥150–<300 cells/μL (N=84) experiencing CSEs decreased from 95% to 63%, and the proportion experiencing exacerbations requiring hospitalisation or emergency department visits decreased from 43% to 19%. The rate of CSEs reduced from 4.53 to 1.47 per year (rate ratio [95% confidence interval {CI}]: 0.32 [0.25, 0.41]). After 2 years of mepolizumab exposure, the mean (95% CI) clinic pre-bronchodilator percent predicted FEV 1 was 80.1 (69.4, 90.7) compared with 62.6 (54.1, 71.1) at baseline (28% relative increase). The median average daily dose of mOCS decreased from 10.0 to 1.5 mg·day −1 (85% relative reduction from baseline); 44% of patients discontinued completely. The minimum clinically important difference in ACQ-5 (improvement ≥0.5) was achieved by 82% of patients, with a mean (95% CI) reduction of 1.76 (2.34, 1.19). Conclusions These real-world findings provide evidence for the 2-year sustained benefit following initiation of mepolizumab in patients with severe asthma who have poor disease control and BEC ≥150–<300 cells/μL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Canonica et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: