Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A remark made by Theodor W. Adorno in 1942 gains a new relevance in our current situation of on-going anthropogenic planetary depredation and the ecological challenges it poses: 'Need is a social category. Nature as "drive" is contained within it'. With this remark, Adorno appears to attribute both a natural moment and a social moment to the category of human need. I propose a reading of it in which there are two aspects to need's natural moment: a transgressive power and a reminder of the constitutive materiality of human agency. Moving beyond Adorno I elaborate the first as a call for interpretations and evaluations of human need through reference to human-transcending ideas of 'the good' or 'the just'. I elaborate the second as a call for attentiveness to the normative importance for ethical agency of the multiple, complex entanglements between human agency and other-than-human-agencies. Taken together they call for a decentring and opening of the idea of autonomous agency prevalent in contemporary political theory. This has implications for the politics of need.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maeve Cooke (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: