Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational study finds no significant link between perfusion fluid contamination and early infections in kidney transplant recipients, suggesting the need for microbiological surveillance.
Infections represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant recipients. Preservation fluid (PF) contamination is considered a potential infectious source; however, its clinical relevance remains controversial. To evaluate whether PF contamination acts as a source of early post-transplant infections (within 30 days) and its association with acute rejection, graft loss, and mortality within 90 days. This was a retrospective, observational, and descriptive study based on medical records of patients aged ≥18 years who underwent kidney transplantation between January 2021 and December 2023. Collected variables included demographic, clinical, and post-transplant outcome data. Among 246 recipients with available PF culture data, 27.6% (68/246) presented with PF contamination. Gram-positive cocci accounted for 64.7% of isolates, Gram-negative bacilli, for 35.3%, and fungi, for 2.9%. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) were the most frequent isolate (36.8%). Microbiological concordance between PF isolates and pathogens responsible for early infection were observed in 13.23% (9/68) of cases, with Klebsiella pneumoniae being the predominant pathogen (66.6%). Although the infection rate was higher among patients with positive PF cultures (72%) compared to those with negative cultures (64%), this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.2992). No significant associations were found with mortality (p = 1.000), graft loss (p = 0.8199), or acute rejection (p = 0.5635). PF contamination was frequent and may contribute to early post-transplant infections, reinforcing the importance of microbiological surveillance and preventive strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mantoani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: