Prospective cohort study evaluated umbilical vein hemodynamics in SGA fetuses, suggesting its role in predicting low birth weight.
The umbilical vein (UV) plays a crucial role in fetal oxygenation, and its dysfunction may contribute to adverse outcomes in small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses. We hypothesized that UV Doppler assessment could enhance risk stratification and guide delivery timing. This study compared UV hemodynamics between SGA and appropriately-for-gestational-age (AGA) fetuses to evaluate their predictive value for low birth weight. In this prospective cohort study (Tehran, Iran; July-December 2024), we included singleton pregnancies >32 weeks. SGA was defined as estimated fetal weight (EFW) or abdominal circumference (AC) <10th percentile, excluding fetal growth restriction (EFW/AC <3rd percentile or additional Doppler abnormalities). UV flow (UVF), EFW-normalized UVF (nUVF), and UV diameters (intra-abdominal and free-loop) were compared between SGA and AGA cohorts. Predictive performance for low birth weight (<2500 g) was assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Among 322 pregnancies (78 SGA, 24.2%), SGA fetuses exhibited significantly lower UVF (172.1 versus 216.3 mL/min; P < .001), nUVF (76.4 versus 81.4 mL/minute/kg; P = .048), and narrower UV diameters (both P < .001). After adjustment, differences persisted except for nUVF. UVF and UV diameters moderately predicted low birth weight (areas under the ROC curve [AUCs] > .70), with free-loop diameter showing the highest discrimination (AUC = .798, 95% confidence interval: 0.687-0.909). SGA fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler demonstrate significant UV hemodynamic changes. UV Doppler, particularly free-loop diameter, may help identify high-risk pregnancies, aiding delivery planning. These findings support further exploration of UV assessment in SGA management protocols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parsaei et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: