Pilot study reports improved clinical competence in medical students after an aged care workshop, indicating effective educational strategies addressing COVID-19 disruptions.
As people live longer, most doctors will encounter increasing numbers of older patients. COVID-19 disrupted teaching across the globe. Our aim was to assess whether an Aged Care "Crash Course" is associated with improvements in self-assessed knowledge/ability and addresses gaps for medical students whose clinical experiences were disrupted by COVID-19. A 5-hour multidisciplinary aged care teaching session was designed for and delivered to mid-degree medical students. Lectorials and a workshop comprising "rotation stations" focussed on key topics in aged care. A voluntary, anonymous hard-copy survey was offered before/after the workshop. Amongst 24 attendees, 17 completed the "before" survey, 18 (75%) the "after" (76% female, mean age = 21.5 years). Common self-identified gaps pre-intervention included: physical examination skills, communicating with older patients/carers, delirium/dementia diagnosis/management, and managing medications. Median Likert scores (1-5) for self-assessed competence across key aged-care concepts all improved after the workshop (hand examination p = 0.03, all others p ≤ 0.001), with 1 to point increases in all. Asked if the workshop addressed gaps ("after"), 15/15 responding reported "yes." Key take-home messages commonly referenced the "5 Ps of delirium etiology," gait assessment and medication rationalisation/side-effects. Asked "what worked well," "rotation stations" and teaching quality commonly featured. This model could be replicated in other settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Danielle Ní Chróinín (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: