Retrospective study assesses growth rates and renal function impact in biopsy-confirmed oncocytic tumors, suggesting effective management.
Oncocytic neoplasms account for up to 15% of small renal masses. Active surveillance (AS) is increasingly adopted for these lesions; however, knowledge gaps remain regarding their growth kinetics, concordance with renal tumor biopsy, and impact on renal function. This study reviews these factors in the largest cohort of biopsy-confirmed oncocytic neoplasms managed with AS. This single-center, retrospective study included patients with biopsy-confirmed oncocytoma or chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) on AS (2003-2021). Tumor growth rates and change in renal function (eGFR) were analyzed using linear mixed models, while development of chronic kidney disease was assessed using Cox proportional hazards model. Biopsy-to-surgical pathology concordance and triggers for intervention were examined. Among 229 patients (245 lesions; 222 oncocytomas, 23 chRCC), the median time between first and last imaging was 4.7 and 2.5 years, respectively. Predicted growth rates were 0.21 cm/year (oncocytoma) and 0.31 cm/year (chRCC). Larger baseline tumor size correlated with faster growth (p=0.04), while age inversely correlated with growth rate (p<0.01). Intervention was more common in the chRCC cohort (35% vs. 13%). Biopsy-to-surgical pathology concordance rates were 80% for oncocytoma and 86% for chRCC. No significant association was found between tumor size and renal function decline (p=0.3) or level (p=0.6). There were no events of metastases or kidney cancer-related deaths over median follow-up of 5.7 years (IQR 3.0, 8.7). Oncocytic lesions on AS demonstrate slow growth, low intervention rate, preservation of renal function and excellent disease-specific survival. While biopsy limitations exist, histology-guided AS provides effective management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raveendran et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: