Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review examines therapies targeting lipopolysaccharides in sepsis, revealing challenges and implications for treatment.
Gram-negative bacterial sepsis remains a major global health threat, exacerbated by rising antimicrobial resistance and limited efficacy of current therapies. Central to its pathogenesis is lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a potent endotoxin that triggers overwhelming inflammation and organ dysfunction. This review critically evaluates emerging therapies targeting LPS in sepsis. Key strategies include antibiotics disrupting LPS biosynthesis and transport (e.g., zosurabalpin, darobactin), monoclonal and bispecific antibodies, extracorporeal endotoxin removal devices, and novel agents like LpxC inhibitors and nanotechnology-based platforms. Despite promising preclinical and early clinical data, translation to practice is limited by pharmacokinetic challenges, toxicity, resistance mechanisms, and inadequate patient stratification. Anti-LPS antibodies and polymyxins have shown selective benefits but face setbacks in broader trials. Nanotherapeutics and targeted filtration systems like oXiris® and Alteco® offer adjunctive potential but require validation through randomized studies. The complexity of LPS biology and sepsis heterogeneity underscores the need for precision medicine approaches and biomarker-guided interventions. Addressing scalability, regulatory hurdles, and cost-effectiveness will be critical to integrating LPS-targeted therapies into standard sepsis care. This review outlines a translational roadmap to harness these innovations and improve outcomes in Gram-negative sepsis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akele et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: