The platform rapidly profiles drug effects in 3D tumor spheroids, suggesting improved techniques for drug screening and tumor modeling.
High-content, high-throughput (HCHT) screening platforms are essential for drug discovery, yet conventional 2D assays lack physiological relevance, and current 3D spheroid systems often face challenges to scalability, uniformity, and the analytical efficiency required for statistically robust screening. Here, we present a fully integrated 3D HCHT platform that synergizes tumor spheroid arrays generated from a bioinert inverted colloidal crystal (iCC) hydrogel framework with an automated, high-speed image analysis pipeline for rapid and spatially resolved therapeutic profiling. The iCC framework enables spontaneous self-assembly of highly ordered tumor spheroid array at high spheroid density (∼79.8 spheroids·mm-2) with tight size uniformity (<10% standard deviation), supporting reproducible and high-content imaging (∼40 spheroids·image-1). The automated image-processing algorithm achieves robust region-of-interest segmentation, fluorescence-weighted-spheroid centroiding (FwSC), and multiparametric spatial analysis in <5 s per image─markedly faster than well-plate analysis (e.g., ∼5 min per 96-well plate) or sequential single-spheroid analysis methods (∼1 s per spheroid). Using this platform, we capture dose-dependent diffusion of doxorubicin, tumor penetration profile of small extracellular vesicles, and cell-type-specific infiltration behaviors of monocytes versus macrophages. Comparative viability profiling across chemotherapeutics further reveals distinct spatial toxicity signatures, highlighting the importance of spatial context in drug response assessment. Collectively, this platform enables rapid, reproducible, and spatially informative screening in 3D, offering a powerful tool for drug discovery, tumor modeling, and immunotherapeutic development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeon et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: