Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multiplexed super-resolution microscopy reveals spatial relationships between NMDA receptors and protein complexes in synapses, highlighting implications for neurotransmission.
Tight coordination of spatial relationships between protein complexes is required for cellular function. In neuronal synapses, proteins responsible for neurotransmission form subsynaptic nanoclusters whose trans-cellular alignment modulates synaptic signal propagation. However, the spatial relationships between these proteins and NMDA receptors (NMDARs), which are required for learning and memory, remain undefined. Here, we mapped key NMDAR subunits relative to active zone and post-synaptic density reference proteins using multiplexed super-resolution DNA-PAINT microscopy in rat hippocampal neurons. GluN2A and GluN2B subunits formed diverse nanoclusters that, surprisingly, were not localized near presynaptic vesicle release sites marked by Munc13-1. However, a subset of release sites was enriched with NMDARs, and modeling indicated this nanotopography promotes NMDAR activation. These enriched sites were internally denser with Munc13-1, aligned with PSD-95, and closely associated with specific NMDAR nanodomains. NMDAR activation rapidly reorganized this relationship, suggesting a structural mechanism for tuning NMDAR-mediated synaptic transmission. These findings suggest synaptic functional architecture depends on assembly of and trans-cellular spatial relationships between multiprotein nanodomains. Spatial relationships between clustered proteins within synapses shape neurotransmission. Here, NMDA receptors are shown to align with only a subset of presynaptic release sites, suggesting a structural mechanism controls NMDAR-mediated synaptic transmission.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anderson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: