Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Simulation reveals a new FLNG liquefaction process achieves low power consumption and high adaptability in offshore settings, suggesting promising applications.
To meet the high standards required for the liquefaction process by the Floating Liquefied Natural Gas System (FLNG), including low power consumption, compact footprint, high safety, resistance to waves, and portability, this paper proposes a novel FLNG liquefaction process which combines the supersonic swirling separation technology with pressurized liquefaction technology. The process is simulated and optimized using Aspen HYSYS V10 software and genetic algorithms. The results indicate that the specific power consumption of this liquefaction process is only 0.208 kWh/m3, with the cooler, expander, and compressor being the main equipment responsible for exergy losses, accounting for 28.85%, 26.48%, and 21.70%, respectively. This liquefaction process is relatively adaptable to changes in feed gas pressure, temperature, and methane content. The specific power consumption slightly increases with the increasing feed gas pressure and temperature, while it exhibits some fluctuations with the increasing methane content. The process requires a low CO2 removal rate, possesses moisture pretreatment capability, has fewer pieces of equipment, and saves a significant amount of valuable space. It combines low specific power consumption, minimal impact from swaying, and high safety, providing considerable application potential in future offshore natural gas development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: