Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ChIP-Seq analyses reveal an epigenetic signature in the controlling element of Sciara coprophila, suggesting mechanisms of chromosomal imprinting.
The term chromosomal imprinting was introduced to denote the parent-of-origin-dependent behavior of chromosomes in the fungus gnat originally named Sciara coprophila (current taxonomic name is Bradysia coprophila). Such behavior is observed in Sciara coprophila embryos, where paternal X chromosomes (Xp) are specifically eliminated during the 7th–8th cleavage divisions. Elimination is regulated by a controlling element (CE) that has been mapped to heterochromomere II (H2) within the sub-telomeric short arm of polytene X chromosomes. Here, using a combination of a new Sciara genome assembly, along with ChIP-Seq and MeDIP analyses, we show that a 1.2 Mb region within the CE locus has a repressive epigenetic signature that is characterised by enrichments of H3K9me3, H4K20me3 and 5′-methyl cytosine (5meC). These data provide evidence for a model where the H3K9me3/HP1/H4K20me3 pathway operates to assemble a heterochromatin-like complex at the CE that renders it silent on Xp chromosomes that are not eliminated. In this regard, our findings support the idea that the H3K9me3/HP1/H4K20me3 pathway represents the most evolutionarily conserved mechanism linked to chromosomal imprinting in animals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Posukh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: