Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study shows income impacts menstrual poverty and social anxiety in female university students, indicating a need for targeted interventions.
In this cross-sectional study, we investigated the relationships between income, menstrual poverty, social anxiety, and academic success among 640 female undergraduates at Pamukkale University, Türkiye, using structural equation modeling. We collected data between April 1 and 15, 2025. We found moderate menstrual poverty (mean score 35.87 ± 6.35) and social anxiety (28.94 ± 10.59). Lower income predicted higher menstrual poverty (β = -0.199, p < .001), which directly increased social anxiety (β = 0.316, p < .001) and reduced academic success (β = -0.161, p = .002). Social anxiety also negatively affected academic success (β = -0.039, p = .046). We identified significant indirect effects: income influenced academic success through menstrual poverty (β = 0.032, p = .010) and through the sequential pathway of menstrual poverty and social anxiety (β = 0.002, p = 0.045). Income had no direct effect on academic success (β = 0.207, p = .559). Our findings underscore the need for campus interventions addressing menstrual product access, infrastructure, and mental health support to mitigate educational impacts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uzun et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: