Prospective study reveals early maladaptive schemas relate to anxiety and depression in breast cancer, indicating significant illness representation effects.
Illness representations and Early Maladaptive Schemas (EMSs) play a significant role in shaping emotional self-regulation processes. EMSs are trait-like structures that constitute vulnerability factors associated with psychopathology in adulthood. Adverse life events, such as a breast cancer (BC) diagnosis, are assumed to trigger these EMSs. The present study examined, in a sample of BC patients, whether EMSs are related to anxiety/depression, directly as well as indirectly, through illness representations. The study employed a prospective design, and newly diagnosed BC patients (N = 95; mean age = 50.4) completed self-report questionnaires within 4 wk (T0), 4 months (T1), and 12 months (T2) after surgery. The Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form (YSQ-S3), the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (Brief IPQ), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were used. Path analysis revealed a statistically significant direct effect of T0 Vulnerability to Harm on T2 anxiety (β = 0.23, p = 0.014). Vulnerability to Harm also predicted anxiety and depression through emotional representations (β = 0.16 and 0.13, respectively, p < 0.01). A direct effect of the Enmeshment EMS was also observed on anxiety (β = 0.21 p = 0.010). Vulnerability to Harm and Enmeshment EMSs both fall under the "impaired autonomy/performance" domain, reflecting lower self-esteem, diminished ability to function independently, and heightened fear. Recognizing these dispositional factors early is crucial for preventing long-term distress. The finding that illness representations mediated the relationship only for the Vulnerability to Harm EMS suggests a unique relationship between this schema and how individuals perceive their illness, likely due to its relevance to the illness experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karveli et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: