Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study demonstrates machine learning enhances identification probability in nontargeted analysis, indicating better chemical identification accuracy.
In HRMS-based nontargeted analysis (NTA), spectral matching is crucial for chemical identification, particularly in the absence of retention information. This study introduces class probability of true positives (P(TP)) as an innovative approach, leveraging data from MS/MS spectra and calibrant-free predicted retention time indices (RTIs) through 3 machine learning (ML) models to enhance identification probability (IP). The first model is a molecular fingerprint (MF)-to-RTI model trained on 4713 calibrants. The second model, a cumulative neutral loss (CNL)-to-RTI model, utilized 485,577 experimental spectra. The final model, a binary classification model, was trained using 1,686,319 TP and semisynthetic true negative (TN) spectral matches. High correlations between MF-derived and CNL-derived RTI values (R2 = 0.96 for training; 0.88 for testing) suggest reduced RTI errors in TP spectral matches. Incorporating reference spectral library searches and RTI errors, the k-nearest neighbors algorithm achieved a weighted F1 score of 0.65 and a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.30 for pesticides at concentrations of 1 to 1000 ppb in blank samples, with a recall of 0.60 in black tea matrices. Compared to solely library matching, the average IPs for pesticides increased by 54.5, 52.1, and 46.7% when spiked in blank, 10× diluted, and 100× diluted tea matrices, respectively. This work demonstrates the effectiveness of ML in enhancing the chemical IPs of annotated compounds within complex matrices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ngan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: