Characterization of abnormal spirometry phenotypes in 8-year-olds born preterm or low birth weight, indicating significant health impacts.
Preterm birth is associated with poor expiratory airflow, but spirometry phenotypes are not well-described. To characterise abnormal spirometry phenotypes at age 8 years in children born either extremely preterm (EP; <28 weeks' gestation) or extremely low birth weight (ELBW; <1000 g birth weight), and to describe the early-life (perinatal and early growth) variables associated with each phenotype. Participants comprised survivors born EP/ELBW in Victoria, Australia, in three eras (1991-1992, 1997 and 2005) and contemporaneous term-born controls with spirometry data at 8 years. Abnormal spirometry phenotypes included: prematurity-associated obstructive lung disease (POLD), prematurity-associated preserved ratio of impaired spirometry (pPRISm) and prematurity-associated dysanapsis (pDysanapsis). Lung volumes measured by plethysmography and early-life variables were compared between each abnormal and the normal spirometry phenotype. Overall, 29% (156/544) of children born EP/ELBW had an abnormal spirometry phenotype compared with 9% (47/524) term-born controls (OR 4.06, 95% CI 2.85 to 5.79; p<0.001). Compared with children born EP/ELBW with normal spirometry (71%), children born EP/ELBW with pPRISm (11%) had reduced total lung volume. Both POLD (8%) and pPRISm phenotypes showed evidence of air trapping. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia was associated with both POLD and pPRISm. Lower gestational age and poorer weight gain between birth and 2 years were associated with pPRISm. No early life variables were associated with pDysanapsis (9%). Over one-quarter of children born EP/ELBW have abnormal spirometry phenotypes. Abnormal spirometry phenotypes differ in their associations with perinatal or early growth variables.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martínez et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: