Mixed-methods study reveals gaps in disaster management training for anesthesiologists in resource-limited settings, suggesting urgent improvements are needed.
To evaluate anesthesiologists' preparedness and training needs during a mass casualty event in a resource-limited setting, focusing on hospital disaster planning and response effectiveness. This study utilized an exploratory mixed-methods design, combining qualitative and quantitative approaches to assess the experiences of anesthesiologists during a catastrophic disaster. Data were collected through interviews and a survey of anesthesiologists who were directly involved in emergency response. The findings highlight significant gaps in disaster preparedness among hospitals, influenced by factors such as physical infrastructure damage, resource shortages, and limited personnel involvement in disaster planning. Anesthesiologists demonstrated adaptability and commitment despite inadequate training and limited disaster management frameworks. The study underscores the urgent need for standardized disaster preparedness plans, multidisciplinary training, and enhanced psychological support for health care professionals. This study reveals critical deficiencies in hospital disaster preparedness and anesthesiologists' training in emergency response. Addressing these gaps through robust disaster planning, simulation-based education, and institutional support is essential to enhance health care systems' resilience in resource-limited and conflict-affected regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raad et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: